![]() Second, you need to be prepared to pay for the privilege of using a premium professional application. "So should you get Capture One Pro? First, you need to check it supports your camera’s raw files and has profiles for the lenses you use most often. There is a good review of C1P ver 11 here, and a quote from it: : Any suggestions on methodology will be welcome too. Anyway, thanks and I realize that transitioning from Aperture's database to move everything over to a new tool is going to be a monster of work. So even though it's old and I will have to upgrade an a few years, it's probably capable of working OK for these tools as far as I can tell. My current computer is an iMac 5K from 2014 (so it's 4 years old) but it has a 4GhZ Intel Core i7, 16GB of DD3 Ram, and a Radeon R9 M290X 2048 MB graphics card. So given those needs/wants, which of these tools would you buy? I think they both work with both Windows and Mac, but if you have any information that one of these works better with one than the other, please let me know. I know there is no knowing this, but it's a consideration. It would be nice if whatever tool I chose lasted a while and I didn't have to do this over again in a couple of years. Yes I know Leica tends to work with Lightroom, but I don't want a subscription plan (I don 't want Capture one's subscription plan either).Ĥ. Admittedly, they don't really require much correction but it would be nice to have and having corrections for other Leica M type lenses and Leica TM lenses would be nice too - Voigtlander, Zeiss, etc. Profiles for my lenses - mostly this is Leica lenses. Next time I don't want to worry about where the originals are.ģ. Aperture is kind of straining I think with my current database size and when I move everything out of aperture I will have to export originals (and probably edited versions too? unclear.). Keeping pictures in controlled normal file structures (even if I can't keep the non destructive editing changes, at least I want the original raws not inside a database as they are in Aperture). Believable HDR - that is blending exposure levels from multiple framesĢ. What I'd like to be able to do, other than these things, if it were possible would be the following:ġ. I occasionally use photoshop to do more extensive cloning (like for dusty negatives for film) or for resizing photographs (and for non photo related layered documents). So what I tend to do is to use Aperture as an organizer and also to do most of the fairly simple photo editing I do - levels, saturation, exposure, occasional cloning stamp, and so on. I may also update to a PC too and could do that now if I needed to (that is, at least, an option I'm considering). Both are also probably not going to work if I ever update my Mac. Both these are old, and both are basically unsupported. Ok, I'm considering these as possible replacements to what I'm currently using - Apple Aperture and Photoshop CS3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |